Tuesday, January 31, 2012

Leaving Your Pets In A Pet Day Care In Houston | Dating Advice ...

A Pet Day Care Houston is a special place where you can drop your pets in cases when you have to go somewhere and you cannot attend to their needs on that day. Instead of leaving them alone or leaving them with someone else, it is better if you can leave them to a professional so that you will be assured that they will be properly cared for.

Pets that are better off in the hands of people who work in a daycare are those pets that are still too young to be on their own. A good example of these are puppies. A puppy would get very sad when they are along for a very long time. They also have a lot of needs that have to be attended to.

Before leaving them in a daycare, you have to be very sure that the place where you will take can be relied on. Leave them in a place where you know they will be happy and will be very comfortable. Check the daycare so you will see for yourself it is safe, clean, well equipped, and have friendly people.

After deciding where to take them, write down all the information about your pets that you want to tell to the caretakers. Tell them about their feeding time, the food that they eat, any allergies, and your contact information just in case something will happen. You can also bring a favorite toy or blanket.

For owners of puppies and other young pets, it would be better to find a place that separates their older customers from the younger ones. This is preferable so that the young pets will not be put in danger.

Daycares also have other services that you can avail of if you are interested. You can have them groom your pets or train with certain commands if they still do not know how to follow it. Inform them if you want to get these services for your furry companion.

If you are a very busy person, find a trusted Pet Day Care Houston where you can leave your beloved pets anytime it is necessary. It would be better if it just near where you live or the place where you work.

Learn more here: Pet Day Care Houston

Source: http://datingadvicesingles.com/love/?p=43758

joe pa dead stephen colbert south carolina seal laura dekker keystone pipeline mitt romney drew peterson untouchable

Time short for Gingrich to close gap in Florida (AP)

MIAMI ? Newt Gingrich slammed GOP rival Mitt Romney on Sunday for the steady stream of attacks he likened to "carpet-bombing," trying to cut into the resurgent front-runner's lead in Florida in the dwindling hours before Tuesday's pivotal presidential primary.

Surging ahead in polls, Romney kept the pressure on Gingrich with a dominant advertising presence that questioned the former House speaker's leadership and ethics. During campaign stops, Romney divided his focus between Gingrich and President Barack Obama.

In what has become a wildly unpredictable race, the momentum has swung back to Romney, staggered last weekend by Gingrich's victory in South Carolina. Romney has begun advertising in Nevada ahead of that state's caucuses next Saturday, illustrating the challenges ahead for Gingrich, who has pledged to push ahead no matter what happens in Florida.

Romney's campaign has dogged Gingrich at his own campaign stops, sending surrogates to remind reporters of Gingrich's House ethics probe in the 1990s and other episodes in his career.

Gingrich reacted defensively, accusing the former Massachusetts governor and a political committee that supports him of lying, and the GOP's establishment of allowing it.

"I don't know how you debate a person with civility if they're prepared to say things that are just plain factually false," Gingrich said during appearances on Sunday talk shows. "I think the Republican establishment believes it's OK to say and do virtually anything to stop a genuine insurgency from winning because they are very afraid of losing control of the old order."

Gingrich objected specifically to a Romney campaign ad that includes a 1997 NBC News report on the House's decision to discipline Gingrich, then speaker, for ethics charges.

After hounding Gingrich during two debates last week, Romney returned more of his attention to Obama, who had been Romney's chief target as he tried to make the case that he was the most worthy Republican to challenge the Democratic incumbent.

But Romney didn't relent in swiping at Gingrich, even as an NBC News/Marist poll published Sunday showed Romney with support from 42 percent of likely Florida primary voters, compared with 27 percent for Gingrich.

"He's now finding excuses ... complaining about what he thinks were the reasons he thinks he's had difficulty here in Florida. But you know, we've got a president who has a lot of excuses," Romney said at a rally in Naples. "And the excuses are over, it's time to produce."

Former Pennsylvania Sen. Rick Santorum, trailing in Florida by a wide margin, stayed in his home state, where his 3-year-old daughter, Bella, was hospitalized. She has a genetic condition caused by the presence of all or part of an extra 18th chromosome. Aides said he would resume campaigning as soon as possible.

Texas Rep. Ron Paul, who has invested little in Florida, looked ahead to Nevada. The libertarian-leaning Paul is focusing more on gathering delegates in caucus states, where it's less expensive to campaign. But securing the nomination only through caucus states is a hard task.

The race began moving toward a two-person fight in South Carolina, and has grown more bitter and personal in Florida.

The intense effort by Romney to slow Gingrich is comparable his strategy against Gingrich in the closing month before Iowa's leadoff caucuses Jan. 3.

Gingrich led in Iowa polls, lifted by what were hailed as strong performances in televised debates, only to drop in the face of withering attacks by Romney, aided immensely by ads sponsored by a political committee run by former Romney aides.

In Florida, senior Romney aides have popped up at Gingrich events to question Gingrich's conservative credentials. Led by Romney's top Iowa adviser, David Kochel, Romney's team cites Gingrich's criticism of House Budget Committee chairman Paul Ryan's Medicare overhaul plan last year, and his appearance with then-House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., in an advertisement supporting climate-change legislation.

"That kind of language emboldens the critics of conservatism," Kochel said. "We're out pointing that out correcting the record."

Gingrich has responded by criticizing Romney's conservative credentials. Outside an evangelical Christian church in Lutz, Gingrich said he was the more loyal conservative on key social issues.

"This party is not going to nominate somebody who is a pro-abortion, pro-gun-control, pro-tax increase liberal," Gingrich said. "It isn't going to happen."

But Gingrich, in appearances on Sunday news programs, returned to complaining about Romney's tactics, rather than emphasizing his own message as that of a conservative with a record of action in Congress.

"When we get to a positive idea campaign, I consistently win," Gingrich said. "It's only when he can mass money to focus on carpet-bombing with negative ads that he gains any traction at all."

Romney and the political committee that supports him had combined to spend some $6.8 million in ads criticizing Gingrich in the Florida campaign's final week. Gingrich and a group that supports him were spending about one-third that amount.

Gingrich worked to portray himself as the insurgent outsider, collecting the endorsement of tea party favorite Herman Cain, whose own campaign for president foundered amid sexual harassment allegations.

It was unclear how aggressively Gingrich would be able to compete in states beyond Florida. The next televised debate, a format Gingrich has used to his advantage, is not until Feb. 22, more than three weeks away.

Romney already has campaigned in Nevada more than Gingrich, is advertising there, and stresses his business background in a state hard-hit by the economy. His campaign welcomed the Sunday endorsement of the Las Vegas Review-Journal, Nevada's largest newspaper.

Michigan and Maine, states where Romney is well-positioned also hold their contests in February. Arizona, a strong tea-party state where Gingrich could do well, has its primary Feb. 28.

___

Associated Press writers Steve Peoples in Naples and Shannon McCaffrey in Lutz contributed to this report.

Source: http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/rss/obama/*http%3A//news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20120129/ap_on_el_pr/us_gop_campaign

amazon prime spina bifida new kindle trill amazon tablet amazon tablet carl sagan

Monday, January 30, 2012

Do you really need that deep freezer? Really?

The distinction between wanting an item and needing it is a key one. If you don't need something right away, it pays to be patient with your shopping.

When we were first considering a move into our current home, my wife and I made a list of things that we wanted to have in our home that we just didn?t have room for in our small apartment. One of the big items on that list was a deep freezer.

Skip to next paragraph Trent Hamm

The Simple Dollar is a blog for those of us who need both cents and sense: people fighting debt and bad spending habits while building a financially secure future and still affording a latte or two. Our busy lives are crazy enough without having to compare five hundred mutual funds ? we just want simple ways to manage our finances and save a little money.

Recent posts

We wanted one primarily because we often had offers of buying shares of venison or beef, where entire animals had been processed at a meat locker and the person was hoping to get back some of their investment by selling a quarter of the meat. Per pound, this was an incredible deal, but you would often have to deal with thirty or forty pounds (or more ? sometimes much more) of wrapped and processed meat.

We also wanted to take advantage of specific sales at the grocery store. For example, if a store has a sale on flash-frozen vegetables, we?ll often stock up on them.

As we moved into our current home, we had money set aside for buying a deep freezer, an amount based on the prices we could easily find at the time. We knew some of the specific models we wanted that had a good ?bang for the buck,? and we had the cash in hand. Time to buy, right?

Wrong.

The thing was that we didn?t immediately need that deep freezer. Yes, we wanted one and it was clear that over the long run such a freezer would save us money, but we weren?t pinned up against the wall with regards to the purchase.

This distinction between want and need is a key one. It is incredibly easy for people to decide that something useful that they merely want is actually more of a need ? something that they have to go out and purchase right away. I see it all the time with people in my social circle, and I even see it uncomfortably often in myself.

Holding back on those ?wants that seem kind of like needs? is essential for saving money.

What are you holding back for? The sale. There are many ways where you can find that item that you?re looking for at a much lower price than what you?ll see at your local department store or appliance store.

All we did is sit on this idea of buying a deep freezer for about two months. We watched the ads from the local hardware and appliance stores, waiting for a great price on one of the models we wanted. Eventually, we found it on sale at about a 35% discount, saving us quite a bit of money.

Even better, during that period, a friend of ours came up with a used deep freezer that he offered to give to us. We were strongly considering taking the item, even though we were a bit concerned about the fan motor in it, but we went for the discounted one instead.

We didn?t lose anything by waiting, but we gained about the third of the cost of our deep freezer.

This type of story repeats itself time and time again when you?re making any major purchase. The price you find today is likely to be easily topped if you exhibit a little bit of patience, and considering that the items that you?d do this with aren?t really essential to your day-to-day life, there?s no real drawback to waiting.

What kind of threshold should you have for pulling the trigger? For me, I usually try to wait for a price that?s at least 20% lower than the lowest regular price I found when I was initially searching for the item.

How long should you wait? This is really up to you. What I typically do is wait until I notice a continuous stream of possible uses for the item I was considering buying. Whenever I notice a use, I bump my threshold for buying closer to the lowest regular price until it becomes clear that the item is nearly a ?need? in terms of how we live our lives, then I?ll just go for the lowest-priced version I can find.

Patience is the key, and patience pays off time and time again.

This post is part of a yearlong series called ?365 Ways to Live Cheap (Revisited),? in which I?m revisiting the entries from my book ?365 Ways to Live Cheap,? which is available at Amazon and at bookstores everywhere.

The Christian Science Monitor has assembled a diverse group of the best economy-related bloggers out there. Our guest bloggers are not employed or directed by the Monitor and the views expressed are the bloggers' own, as is responsibility for the content of their blogs. To contact us about a blogger, click here. To add or view a comment on a guest blog, please go to the blogger's own site by clicking on www.thesimpledollar.com.

Source: http://rss.csmonitor.com/~r/feeds/csm/~3/8qdFOMzQ9jI/Do-you-really-need-that-deep-freezer-Really

neville george lucas numerology the game new hampshire primary hue jackson alabama football

Video: Five tests women should have

Sorry, Readability was unable to parse this page for content.

Source: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21134540/vp/46173828#46173828

sensa sister wives season 2 kerry collins kerry collins jermichael finley diana nyad diana nyad

Sunday, January 29, 2012

Florida Presidential Debate Highlights: Ron Paul Style!


Asked at last night's Florida Republican debate if Mitt Romney and Newt Gingrich should return money made from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, Ron Paul responded:

"That subject really doesn't interest me a whole lot."

The Texas congressman might not be #1 in the polls, but he showed last night that when given a proper forum, he's as substantive as anyone - and funny too.

Asked where he stands on Newt Gingrich's proposal to put a permanent base on the moon by 2020, Paul said, "Well, I don't think we should go to the moon."

"I think we maybe should send some politicians up there."

Paul, who at 76 would be the oldest person ever elected President of the United States also drew cheers in his response to a question about his medical records.

Noting that his records are "about one page, if even that long," Paul challenged his cohorts to "a 25-mile bike ride, any time, any day in the heat of Texas."

But, you know, there are laws against age discrimination, so if you push this too much, you better be careful," he quipped, and he wasn't done by a long shot.

Asked by CNN moderator Wolf Blitzer what he would say if Raul Castro called him in the Oval Office, Paul said, "Well, I'd ask what he called about, you know?"

Which isn't to say Paul's wit was his only asset. He routinely scored points with his strong responses, especially regarding monetary policy and civil liberties.

Florida's primary is Tuesday, January 31.

Source: http://www.thehollywoodgossip.com/2012/01/florida-presidential-debate-highlights-ron-paul-style/

jacoby ellsbury jacoby ellsbury facebook charging act scores the good wife facebook changes man o war

Saturday, January 28, 2012

What You Missed While Not Watching The Last Florida GOP Debate (Time.com)

0 minutes. "Only one thing is certain," CNN's opening montage declares. "Expect the unexpected." That hits the spot. We need false hope at a time like this. It's the 19th Republican debate. Everything that can happen probably already has. The screen flickers with a Romney video clip from the campaign trail. "We're not choosing a talk show host," he says. This will need to be fact checked.

3 minutes. Wolf Blitzer. Facebook. Twitter. You know the drill.

4 minutes. Candidates on the catwalk. They walk out like they have done before. Nothing changes. They shake hands, then stand for the national anthem, sung by the local college's chamber singers, who have dressed for the occasion like puritan flight attendants. They sing well, which is totally unexpected. Santorum and Romney sing along. Gingrich, Paul, and Callista Gingrich, who is seen in a crowd shot, keep their mouths closed. Will have to keep an eye on them. You never know.

7 minutes. More Blitzer, who repeats the rules we have heard 18 times before. Then he asks the candidates to introduce themselves. (See more on the Florida debates.)

8 minutes. Santorum introduces himself by introducing his 93-year-old mother in the audience, who could easily pass for 81, and makes everyone feel good. She stands, Santorum smiles with pride and the crowd cheers wildly. "I'd better just stop right there," Santorum says. Yes, he should. He should also pick mom for vice president.

9 minutes. More of the expected. Gingrich says he is from neighboring Georgia. Romney says he has 16 grand-kids. Paul says he champions "a sound monetary system," which really has nothing to do with expensive acoustics, though don't tell his college-age voters. The dude is totally rad.

10 minutes. First question on immigration. This is totally unexpected. Immigration is usually asked at the end of the debate. Crazy. To allay this shock, the candidates give answers that are no different. Everyone on stage likes laws, wants to seal the borders, and embraces legal immigration. There are requisite mentions of American Express and MasterCard handling identification cards.

14 minutes. "I don't think anyone is interested in going around and rounding up people around the country and deporting 11 million Americans," says Romney. Oops. He recovers quickly: "Or, excuse me 11 million illegal immigrants into America." Paul follows up by saying he would end U.S. military involvement on the Afghan border to pay for more guards on the Mexican border.

16 minutes. Blitzer asks Gingrich why he called Romney the "most anti-immigrant candidate" in a recent ad. "Because, in the original conversations about deportation, the position I took, which he attacked pretty ferociously, was that grandmothers and grandfathers aren't going to be successfully deported," Gingrich says. This is a backhanded way of accusing Romney of wanting to deport Santorum's sweet mother, if she had no papers. (See more on the GOP debates.)

19 minutes. Romney, who has been giving Gingrich the evil eye, pounces. "That's simply unexcusable. That's inexcusable," Romney says, flip-flopping "un" for "in" in three words. "Mr. Speaker, I'm not anti-immigrant. My father was born in Mexico. My wife's father was born in Wales. They came to this country. The idea that I'm anti-immigrant is repulsive." It's the first time in 19 debates that someone has used the word "repulsive." Unexpected and about time. Romney goes on to say he is not going to round-up grandmothers. He is just going to deny them of employment, and hope they leave the country.

20 minutes. Gingrich says he would like Romney to "self-describe" himself, if he is not anti-immigrant for wanting to expel grandmothers. Romney, in full alpha dog mode, is off again. "There are grandmothers that live on the other side of the border that are waiting to come here legally. I want them to come here, too, not just those that are already here," Romney says. So he is not anti-grandma, he just favors some over others. More grandma back and forth follows.

21 minutes. Blitzer asks Romney about an ad he is running that says Gingrich called Spanish "the language of the ghetto." "I haven't seen the ad, so I'm sorry. I don't get to see all the TV ads," Romney replies. Later Romney adds about the ad, "I doubt that's my ad, but we'll take a look and find out." It is Romney's ad, a Spanish language radio spot. Gingrich said it, in a discussion about the importance of learning English, and later admitted that he chose his words poorly.

23 minutes. A question about the influence of China in Latin America. Paul calls for more free trade. Santorum warns of radical Islam in Venezuala and promises to be more involved as president in the continent. Paul and Santorum squabble about the proper reach of U.S. foreign policy.

29 minutes. During the squabble, Blitzer double checks the origin of the Romney ad. "It was one of your ads. It's running here in Florida on the radio. And at the end you say, 'I'm Mitt Romney and I approved this ad.' " Romney has no response. "Let me ask the speaker a question. Did you say what the ad says or not? I don't know," he says instead. "It's taken totally out of context," protests Gingrich. "Oh, OK, he said it," Romney concludes, misrepresenting what Gingrich just said to prove that he had not previously misrepresented something Gingrich once said.

30 minutes. Moving on to housing. How do you get Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae out of housing? Romney attacks Gingrich for once working as a political consultant for Freddie Mac. "We should have had a whistle-blower and not horn-tooter," says Romney. Romney never uses bad words. Maybe this is why "tooter" sounds so naughty.

31 minutes. Gingrich responds by attacking Romney for holding stock in Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae, as well as investing in Goldman Sachs, "which is today foreclosing on Floridians." Romney shoots back that most of these investments were in mutual funds controlled by a blind trust. Back in 1994, Romney argued that blind trusts were not really blind, since politicians could still direct the investments. But never mind that now. Because Romney then says, "And Mr. Speaker, I know that sounds like an enormous revelation, but have you checked your own investments?" Apparently, Gingrich also owned stock in Fannie and Freddie. Gingrich says, "Right," thereby admitting his whole attack was a giant exercise in hypocrisy.

34 minutes. Gingrich finds his comeback. "To compare my investments with his is like comparing a tiny mouse with a giant elephant," Gingrich says. Never before has "elephant" been used as an insult in a Republican debate. Unexpected.

35 minutes. Paul is asked to comment. "That subject really doesn't interest me a whole lot," he says, to applause. Got to love that guy. He goes on to blame the housing bubble on the Federal Reserve.

36 minutes. Santorum chastises Blitzer for focusing on these issues. "Can we set aside that Newt was a member of Congress and used the skills that he developed as a member of Congress to go out and advise companies -- and that's not the worst thing in the world -- and that Mitt Romney is a wealthy guy because worked hard and he's going out and working hard?" he asks. Not likely. But the crowd applauds. (See more on the State of the Union Address.)

37 minutes. First commercial break. Blitzer promises to talk about space when we return.

40 minutes. We are back to talk about tax returns. Is Gingrich satisfied with the Romney releases? "Wolf, you and I have a great relationship, it goes back a long way. I'm with him," Gingrich says of Santorum. "This is a nonsense question." Blitzer points out that Gingrich recently said of Romney, "He lives in a world of Swiss bank and Cayman Island bank accounts."

41 minutes. Just as Gingrich seems to be succeeding in getting the question dropped, Romney jumps in. "Wouldn't it be nice if people didn't make accusations somewhere else that they weren't willing to defend here?" he says. So Gingrich pivots from bickering with Blitzer, and attacks Romney. "I don't know of any American president who has had a Swiss bank account," he says. "I'd be glad for you to explain that sort of thing."

43 minutes. Romney blames the blind trust. Then he finds words to defend his wealth that have been missing for the last three debates. "I'm proud of being successful. I'm proud of being in the free enterprise system that creates jobs for other people. I'm not going to run from that," Romney says. "I'm proud of the taxes I pay. My taxes, plus my charitable contributions, this year, 2011, will be about 40 percent." The two men go back and forth a bit more.

45 minutes. Some talk about tax rates. Gingrich tries to explain why he both talks about Romney's tax rates in a derogatory way and wants to reduce his taxes to zero, by eliminating the capital gains tax. Gingrich says he wants everyone to pay what Romney now pays in taxes, even if it means reducing Romney's taxes further. "My goal is to shrink the government to fit the revenue, not to raise the revenue to catch up with the government," he says. Santorum chimes in to say he doesn't want taxes quite as low as Gingrich. Paul says he wants to get rid of the 16th Amendment, which gives Congress the power to collect taxes.

49 minutes. Blitzer asks Paul if he will release his health records. "Oh, obviously, because it's about one page," the 76-year-old says. "I'm willing to challenge any of these gentlemen up here to a 25- mile bike ride any time of the day in the heat of Texas." Everyone else on stage agrees to release their health records too.

50 minutes. Space cadet time. Romney is against a moon base, but for a vibrant space program, whatever that means. Gingrich is for a moon base, largely to beat the Chinese, but he says lots of the efforts to get there could be done with private enterprise. Santorum thinks a moon base is too expensive. "Well, I don't think we should go to the moon," says Paul. "I think we maybe should send some politicians up there." Paul is so cool. Maybe his sound monetary policy does have beats after all. (See photos of Obama's State of the Union Address)

56 minutes. Blitzer points out that Gingrich would allow a lunar colony with 13,000 Americans in it apply for statehood, which is probably a pander to the same stoner college vote that Paul has wrapped up. Romney, who is still in alpha dog mode, attacks again. "I spent 25 years in business," he says. "If I had a business executive come to me and say they wanted to spend a few hundred billion dollars to put a colony on the moon, I'd say, You're fired.'" Romney tends to get in trouble when he talks about firing people. Yet he still does it. Then he accuses Gingrich of pandering to Floridians, like he did to South Carolinians, and to New Hampshirites.

59 minutes. Gingrich answers by pandering more. "The port of Jacksonville is going to have to be expanded because the Panama Canal is being widened, and I think that's useful thing for a president to know," he says. He also talks about the Everglades. Then he claims again to have created four consecutive balanced budgets, which is not true. (See last debate recap.)

60 minutes. Paul points out that the balanced budgets Gingrich claims still included deficits, if one accounts for the money that was taken out of Social Security. "I agree with Ron," Gingrich responds, once again undermining his own talking point. "I actually agree with you, and I propose that we take Social Security off budget."

62 minutes. Question from the audience by an unemployed woman without health insurance. She asks what the candidates would do for her. Paul says he would get government out of health insurance. Gingrich says he would repeal ObamaCare and get the economy going again, and create a new health reform that gives her a tax break to buy health insurance.

64 minutes. Romney basically agrees, and then attacks President Obama. This is the first time he has attacked Obama in a sustained way. Last debate this moment came at 71 minutes. In the previous dozen or so debates, he always attacked Obama with just about every answer.

66 minutes. Santorum goes after Gingrich and Romney for supporting ObamaCare-like health reforms in the past. The substance has been well tread in prior debates. But what is notable is that in the tit for tat that follows, Santorum kind of gets under Romney's skin in a way that Gingrich has so far failed to do. "I make enough mistakes in what I say, not for you to add more mistakes to what I say," Romney says at one point. It's meant as a joke. But no one laughs.

72 minutes. As Santorum continues to tear into Romney for the horror of what he did in Massachusetts in 2004, it is worth remembering that Santorum endorsed Romney for president in 2008.

75 minutes. "Congressman Paul, who is right?" asks Blitzer. "I think they're all wrong," Paul says.

76 minutes. The candidates are asked to name Hispanic leaders they could see in their cabinet. They all do. Except Paul. "I don't have one particular name that I'm going to bring up," he says.

78 minutes. Commercial break.

82 minutes. We're back. Candidates are asked to say why their wives are great. Paul says he has been married 54 years, and his wife wrote "a very famous cookbook, 'The Ron Paul Cookbook.'" Romney says his wife has overcome breast cancer and Multiple Sclerosis, and wants to make sure young women don't get pregnant before marriage. Gingrich says his wife plays the French horn, and writes patriotic books. Santorum says his wife has written a couple of books, one about their child who died at birth, and another about training kids to have good manners.

88 minutes. Romney and Gingrich are asked to bicker over who is closer to Reagan. Romney admits that it took him a long time to come around to the Reagan view. "I became more conservative," he says. Gingrich says Nancy Reagan told him the Reagan torch had been passed to him. Then he attacks Romney. "In '92 he was donating to the Democrats for Congress and voted for Paul Tsongas in the Democratic primary," Gingrich says. "In '94 running against Teddy Kennedy, he said flatly, I don't want to go back to the Reagan-Bush era, I was an independent."

91 minutes. "I've never voted for a Democrat when there was a Republican on the ballot," says Romney, which is a pretty misleading thing to say. There was also a Republican primary in 1992. Romney could have chosen to vote in it.

92 minutes. Questions about Cuba. Santorum is against the Obama policy of liberalizing relations. He warns of "Jihadist's who want to set up missile sites" in Cuba or Venezuela. Paul shoots back that he doesn't think the American people "see a Jihadist under the bed every night." If he had any chance of winning, Paul would be seen as the winner of this debate.

95 minutes. Romney attacks Obama's Cuba policy. So does Gingrich.

98 minutes. A self-described Palestinian in the audience, as part of a question about Middle East Peace, says, "I'm here to tell you we do exist." Romney responds by saying, "It's the Palestinians who don't want a two-state solution." This is not true. The Palestinians have gone to the United Nations demanding just such a thing, though they differ with Israel about borders and conditions. Gingrich repeats his previous claim about Palestinian invention. "It was technically an invention of the late 1970s, and it was clearly so. Prior to that, they were Arabs. Many of them were either Syrian, Lebanese, or Egyptian, or Jordanian," he says. By that standard, Americans are an invented people too. But no one points this out.

102 minutes. Question about Puerto Rican statehood. Santorum panders a lot, praising Puerto Rico and its leaders. But then declines to take a position on statehood.

105 minutes. Question about how religious views would affect presidency. Paul says all that matters to him in the job is the Constitution. Gingrich says he would pray for guidance and stop the war against Christianity that is being waged by the "secular elite." Santorum says he understands that rights come from God, not government.

110 minutes. One more break.

113 minutes. Last question. Why are you the person most likely to beat Obama? Paul suggests that he can pick up support from Obama's base, by coming at the president from the left on foreign policy and civil liberties. Romney recites his stump speech. Critical time, social welfare state, etc. Gingrich does a riff about Saul Alinsky, food stamps and appeasement. Santorum says he can win blue-collar Reagan Democrats like Reagan did.

120 minutes. We are done. Pretty much as expected. Now Florida must vote. The outcome will no doubt help to determine how many more debates must be endured.

PHOTOS: TIME's Pictures of the Week

PHOTOS: Cartoons of the Week

View this article on Time.com

Most Popular on Time.com:

Source: http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/rss/gop/*http%3A//news.yahoo.com/s/time/20120127/us_time/httpswamplandtimecom20120127whatyoumissedwhilenotwatchingthelastfloridagopdebatexidrssfullnationyahoo

world series tickets world series tickets nelson cruz nelson cruz michael young bears bears

Pride, Frustration and Determination as Egyptians Celebrate Their Revolution (Time.com)

Tens of thousands of Egyptians packed shoulder to shoulder into Cairo's Tahrir Square on Wednesday to mark the one-year anniversary of the uprising that ousted President Hosni Mubarak. Some, particularly Islamist supporters of the Muslim Brotherhood's Freedom and Justice Party and the ultra-Islamist Salafis' Nour party, came out to celebrate their victories after a year of political discovery.

Between them, the Islamist parties won a combined 72% of available seats in the lower house of parliament in the country's first democratic election in more than a half century. "We are here to celebrate what we've achieved, and reiterate what we haven't achieved," said Mohamed Abdel Ghafar, a 40-year-old teacher sporting a Freedom and Justice Party hat. "We achieved the elections and the ousting of Mubarak, putting the symbols of corruption on trial, setting a date for the transition of authority, and lifting the emergency law," he added. Nearby, a speaker on the Brotherhood's stage trumpeted congratulations to Egypt's heroes -- that would be everyone who came out to help overthrow the president.

But thousands of those on Tahrir Square, Wednesday, also came out to protest. While many express satisfactin with the election result, frustration over economic woes, endemic corruption, and the slow pace of reform has deepened in the year since Mubarak's fall. The focus of much of that anger has been the Supreme Council of the Armed Forces (SCAF), the junta that took over from Mubarak last February and has shown little interest in ceding complete executive authority to a civilian government. (MORE: Egyptians Mark Their Revolution's Anniversary with Mixed Feelings)

Men, women, and families thronged beneath banners demanding an end to military rule and justice for those killed and injured by security forces during the uprising and protests since. Liberal youth activists even chanted for the execution of SCAF chief Field Marshall Hussein Tantawi, hoisting posters depicting faces of Mubarak officials, as well as Tantawi and leaders of the Muslim Brotherhood.

"We believe that SCAF lost its legitimacy in August and now it's ruling the country with force," said Mohamed al-Essawy, 24, who held a large stencil depicting the faces of Tantawi and the Brotherhood's speaker of parliament hovering over bodies of slain activists. "They're playing chess with the revolution," he explained. "Anything supervised by SCAF is illegitimate, ranging from the parliament to the constitution."

Liberals, youth activists, and political analysts have increasingly alleged that a conspiracy exists between the Brotherhood and the junta, pointing to the former's seeming compliance with military-drafted rules and declarations. However, the majority of Egyptians seem to disagree. (PHOTOS: Revolution in Egypt: 18 Days That Shook the World)

On January 24th, Tantawi announced the termination of the country's emergency law on national television, in a move aimed at currying favor with the protesters ahead of the one year anniversary of the uprising. For Brotherhood supporters, and many others in Tahrir on Wednesday, the concession seemed like an additional victory. But an exemption decreed by Tantawi, which allows the emergency law's provisions to be applied in cases of "thuggery", had human rights groups crying foul -- the imprecise term has been widely used by the military to prosecute activists over the past year. Human Rights Watch warned that the exception would "invite abuse."

Demonstrators poured into the downtown square throughout the day, many marching the same routes they had taken a year ago to start the historic rebellion. That day was fraught with tension and violence, as protesters broke through police lines and braved volleys of tear gas, astounded and emboldened by the power of their collective action. There were no police lines to cross to get to Tahrir for the anniversary event, and the crowd was far larger this time than it had been a year ago. But nostalgia ran high. Tahrir pulsed with the national pride that had characterized the 18-days that brought down Mubarak. And the crowd's diversity stirred the familiar debate and exchange of ideas that many Egyptians had reveled in a year ago, as men and women from across the country and its social classes first camped in the square, united by the common goal of ousting Mubarak. (PHOTOS: Police and Protesters Clash in Cairo)

"We were not divided back then," remembered Mohamed Farghaly, a university student. "On January 25th 2011, we were unified. We came down to call for the fall of the regime, and at the time, we thought that Mubarak was the regime," he said. "Then we found out that he wasn't." Farghaly admits that his realization hasn't been shared by everyone. "The majority is staying at home," he added, claiming they had been swayed by the "liars" on state TV. "That's the division, and it's one of the biggest challenges."

Indeed, how the numbers fall on either side of that division will impact Tahrir's dynamic in the days ahead. Already, many say they will camp in the square as long as it takes to force the military from power. Some have predicted a repeat of the violent clashes between protesters and security forces that characterized a series of demonstrations in November and December, particularly if large numbers remain in Tahrir and the military moves to clear it. "Some of the people think that we need to stay until SCAF leaves," said one Brotherhood supporter, Mohamed Said. "As Muslim Brotherhood, we don't believe that. We are here to deliver a message." That doesn't mean the revolution is over, he added, but Egyptians can make their voices heard in other ways.

With reporting by Sharaf al-Hourani / Cairo

MORE: How Democracy Can Work in the Middle East

VIDEO: Why They Protest: Egypt, Libya and Syria

View this article on Time.com

Most Popular on Time.com:

Source: http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/rss/world/*http%3A//news.yahoo.com/s/time/20120126/wl_time/08599210538400

gold rush gold rush weather boston chili recipe chili recipe grimm tashard choice

Thursday, January 26, 2012

What does 2012 hold for the jobseeking scientist?

Charlie Ball, deputy director of research at the Higher Educations Careers Services Unit

rexfeatures_1463807b.jpg(Engineers and?IT workers are unlikely to be the unemployed superheroes?of 2012. Image: KeystoneUSA-ZUMA/Rex Features)

I don't like futurology. I like to make statements backed up with evidence, not speculation. Besides, if you make predictions, all that happens is you get things wrong and people laugh at you.

These are my excuses. Because here's how the UK graduate jobs market for scientists is looking for 2012. This piece is essentially a mixture of literature review, trend analysis and sheer, downright gut feeling based on experience. You can't do a rigorously evidenced piece about the future - it would be violating causality, and the editors here really don't like that. The piece is here to be picked at and disagreed with - if you know better about your sector, pitch in. Information is most useful when it's shared.

Anyway, hands up if you think this is going to be a light-hearted, feel-good romp? Some mining engineers in the house, I see. Put your hands down, chemists.

As we're all doubtless aware, the UK economy is not in the best shape right now, and there's debate about whether we're already in another downturn, whether we're about to be, or whether we're going to bypass one, with constantly-evolving economic data cited in all directions. What we do know is that the economy isn't great and doesn't look likely to improve much in 2012. Internationally, there's ongoing concern about the health of various European economies and the consequences for the Euro, whilst there are rumblings of issues in the Chinese economy. I'm not going to speculate about whether there's going to be a Euro collapse and so on - I don't know, and nor does anyone else, and obviously if something like that happens, the picture will change significantly.

But how is all of this affecting science graduates? Well, last year saw the jobs market start to improve for engineers, but tighten for physical scientists and biologists, with a bit of a jump in unemployment rates. This was also the case for doctoral graduates in science, with fewer PhD holders entering much of the private economy, with drops in employment in chemicals, the pharmaceuticals industry and in basic R&D (apart from engineering). However, there were increases in management consultancy, computing and digital consulting and in education and public administration.

Much of these trends seem set to continue. The most recent advice from the Bank of England suggests that engineering and IT might be looking up, and organisations like the IT services provider the FDM Group are making optimistic noises about graduate recruitment this year. On the other hand, the pharmaceutical industry in the UK didn't enjoy a very bright festive period and suffered badly as a result of the recession in the UK. The new High Fliers report suggests that graduate recruitment into the industry has fallen by over 4 per cent since 2007.

The larger pharmaceutical organisations look unlikely to increase employment over 2012. The same cannot necessarily be said for smaller businesses (SMEs) and with an increased focus on these companies, they may be an alternative to larger R&D organisations for scientists looking for work.

Engineers, however, may have a happier time. This is an industry that was hit particularly badly by the recession, with mechanical, civil and chemical engineers all seeing the jobs market worsen significantly. But the data coming back from employers suggests that the engineering labour market is improving, particularly for manufacturing, with even a suggestion of difficulties recruiting for some specialist firms. Some of the news from the oil and gas, and mining industries are also positive, and last year, geology graduates willing to travel were amongst the highest graduate earners of all. The messages from telecoms and utilities are also mixed, but currently reasonably positive. So we're looking at a gradual recovery, but a jobs market that is still nowhere near the strength it was before the recession.

Meanwhile, the jobs market in academia is also uncertain. Cuts in UK Government spending will obviously have an effect, but at the same time, we're into the long-anticipated period when many academics who got their positions at times when the university system was expanding are reaching retirement, so there may be more options around than some might fear. As always, though, these opportunities will be fiercely contested.

Physical scientists may find that the job market related to their field of study gets tougher and that they have to explore other options, whether it be in a smaller business or another sector of the economy.

But even if you have your heart set on a particular kind of job, with even an average new doctoral graduate likely to have around 40 years of work ahead of them, you can always try something else before tackling your chosen industry when you're in a better position to do so - either because you have more and better experience or because the market has improved. Because, after all, here's one prediction for 2012 that is definitely going to be correct - the majority of science graduates will get jobs, the majority of those who get jobs will get ones at graduate level, and you will almost all get good careers in the end - even if they might not be in something you considered while you were at university.

Happy (slightly belated) New Year.

How accurate do you think Charlie's future-gazing will turn out to be? As?he says, if you know better about your sector, pitch in

Source: http://feeds.newscientist.com/c/749/f/10897/s/1c1f67e3/l/0L0Snewscientist0N0Cblogs0Cbigwideworld0C20A120C0A10Cwhat0Edoes0E20A120Eholdave0Ein0Estore0Efor0Ethe0Ejobseeking0Escientist0E10Bhtml0DDCMP0FOTC0Erss0Gnsref0Fonline0Enews/story01.htm

cotton bowl wizards of waverly place cedric benson charles addams pinewood derby cars playoff schedule republican debate tonight

Hangover III Brings Big Payday for Cooper, Galifianakis, and Helms

Posted January 25th, 2012 by Binh Ngo


With salary negotiations apparently done, the third sequel to Hangover can get under way, but it will be costly for Warner Bros., relatively speaking. According to the Hollywood Reporter, the movie's three stars, Bradley Cooper, Zach Galifianakis, and Ed Helms, have negotiated a sweet deal for themselves to the tune of $15 million each against backend.

That's a huge increase from what they were paid for the first and second movie. From the article, the trio were paid just under one million each for the first movie and $5 million (plus backend) for the second.

The two movies combined for a worldwide gross of over $1 billion at the box office: $467 million for Part I and $581 million for Part II. The nice part is that the two movies only cost Warner Bros. $115 million to make.

The Hangover movies appear to be critic-proof as well. While the first Hangover got 78% on RottenTomatoes, the second movie scored only 35%. Despite that, the second movie made even more than the first.

Assuming the third and final Hangover is going to cost in the neighborhood of $60-$80 million and the worldwide gross is going to be similar to the first two movies, it's still a sweet deal for all parties involved. Since this is a backend deal, Warner doesn't have to pay the $60 million until some box office milestone has been met.

Hangover Part III is looking to start production this summer for a Memorial Day 2013 release. The story will take place in Los Angeles and may involve one of the trio trying to escape from a mental hospital and may differ in structure to the two previous movies. Don't hold me to that, however. We'll know more about the plot as more info is released.

Todd Phillips who directed the first two movies will return to helm the third.

Source: http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/1924376/news/1924376/

richard threlkeld stephen colbert running for president moonrise kingdom coachella lineup natalee holloway joran van der sloot school delays

Wednesday, January 25, 2012

Man lodges a nail in his brain and doesn?t realize it for 36 hours (Yahoo! News)

Miraculously, no permanent brain damage was suffered

A Chicago-area man accidentally drove a nail into his?brain last week, and didn't realize it for a full 36 hours.?Dante Autullo was working with a nailgun when the accident occured last Tuesday. Losing his grip while using the gun on top of a wall, it swung around and hit the back of his head. The collision fired a 3 1/2" nail into his skull so cleanly that the wound appeared to be minor.

The incident hardly fazed Autullo, who treated himself by taking a few Advil before finishing his nailing work. Afterward, he?put in an eight-hour shift of work at his job as a plow driver. It wasn't until Thursday that a strong headache sent him to his doctor, who discovered the nail via?X-ray.

Doctors removed the part of Autullo's skull which held the nail in a procedure that took about two hours.?Amazingly, Autullo does not appear to have lost any?brain function as a result of his injury. Doctors believe that complications are unlikely to develop.

[Image credit:?Rosser321]

(Source)

This article wash written by Fox Van Allen and originally appeared on Tecca

More from Tecca:

Source: http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/rss/tech/*http%3A//news.yahoo.com/s/yblog_technews/20120123/tc_yblog_technews/man-lodges-a-nail-in-his-brain-and-doesnt-realize-it-for-36-hours

john edwards jim carrey san francisco chronicle kourtney kardashian pregnant kourtney kardashian pregnant eli manning eli manning

For a abounding, investing in hotels reaps unsubstantial gains ...

MUMBAI: The single of the initial questions tackled by Charles Allen as good as Sharada Dwivedi in The Taj during Apollo Bunder, their pithy latest story of the road residence, is since JN Tata built it during all. They note the renouned story of it being built to revenge the insult of being incited divided from the Europeans-only road residence, yet indicate out which whilst this might good have happened, ?it seems distant as well sparse the reason to glow the male of the distance of JN Tata, who in the past had not hesitated to cranky swords with governments as good as absolute blurb concerns?.

Allen as good as Dwivedi indicate the some-more trustworthy reason could distortion in an essay combined by an editor of the Times of India, Lovat Fraser, who was the tighten crony of Tata. Fraser removed he had combined which ?the male who built the road residence estimable of such the city would do some-more for Bombay than the donor of many museums?. Tata came to him after which as good as pronounced the thought had been in his thoughts for the while: ?He had not the smallest enterprise to own the road residence, however; his solitary instruct was to capture people to India, as good as in reality to urge Bombay.?

Fraser?s essay might have impelled Tata to movement, yet Allen as good as Dwivedi additionally indicate to the sole reason for Tata?s concern. In 1896, the mildew strike Bombay as good as over the subsequent couple of years, the once-prospering city became the shade of itself. During the rise, in 1899, 2, 800 people were failing any week, as good as people were journey the city. Tata had thrown himself in to plague-combat work, as good as contingency have realised which whilst the mildew could be brought underneath carry out, the certainty in the city would not be simply restored.

Structure the grand road residence in Bombay afterwards was the pointer which, during the begin of the latest century, the city was open for commercial operation again. Of march, the lot of the commercial operation was with Tata, which simply shows how, as with many shrewd businessmen, he could foster both open as good as personal interests together.

Yet this incomparable prophesy was mislaid upon Tata?s sisters who were frightened during the thought of him removing in to something as low-class as hospitality. The single is pronounced to have exclaimed to him in Gujarati: ?You have been structure an hospital of scholarship in Bangalore, the good iron as good as steel bureau, as good as the hydro-electric plan ? as good as right away we discuss it us we have been starting to put up the bhatarkhana( eating residence) !?

Currently with the Taj easy to the standing as the single of the world?s many appropriate hotels as good as alternative corporate groups seeking to come in the services zone, this acknowledgement unequivocally seems archaic. Nonetheless this disbelief during the Tatas? liberality impasse persisted for decades, not slightest during prolonged stretches when the zone was low, as good as the flagship road residence something of the dump.

Sometimes, Intangibles can be Strange

The 1950s as good as 60s were substantially the misfortune, when the hotel?s repute ? as good as family significance compared with the group?s sepulchral production businesses ? was during the lowest, nonetheless the costs were the drain. Yet the Tatas resisted the enticement to draw up it of, as good as distant from being surprising, their perspective essentially parallels which of the series of super-rich commercial operation people. Dig in to the portfolios of many of the world?s tip investors as good as we will find the road residence, maybe the sequence, which whilst frequency creation the detriment would frequency appear to beget the earnings such investors customarily require.

Mexico?s Carlos Slim Helu, for e.g., has interests in telecom as good as alternative businesses which continually put him during the tip of the world?s richest chairman list, nonetheless the single of his many long-standing investments is in Road residence Geneve, an superb 105-year-old investiture which might be Mexico City?s homogeneous of the Taj. Prince Al-waleed garbage bin Talal, the legendary Saudi financier, is the vital shareholder in the Four Seasons road residence organisation, as good as has taken sole seductiveness in restoring London?s critical Savoy Hotel.

He was additionally rumored to be in the regulating for Aman Resorts, the ultra-luxury sauna resorts, from the tide Indian owners, the DLF Group. Another Middle-Eastern financier, the Qatar Investment Authority, has paid for Singapore?s ancestral Raffles Hotel. The Sultan of Brunei owns such turning point hotels as London?s Dorchester as good as Paris? Plaza-Athenee. As good as in India as well, Mukesh Ambani?s Reliance has taken the poignant interest in the Oberoi group.

In all these cases, good commercial operation reasons can be done for the investment, nonetheless all these investors could substantially have done some-more income elsewhere if they were seeking usually during returns. Hotels need intemperate investment in infrastructure, maintain as good as unchanging renewals, as good as earnings can be usually anniversary as good as scarily contingent upon the ubiquitous sentiments about the city as good as transport during the sole time.

The deep-pocketed financier can unequivocally assistance, as good as as all these cases infer, utterly mostly such investors have been found who have been peaceful to demeanour over only financial earnings, to assorted unsubstantial benefits of opening hotels as well. Sometimes, it?s loyal, the intangibles can be strange.

The Waldorf-Astoria in Latest York City, the single of the many genre-defining oppulance hotels, originated in the family feud. After the genocide of American multimillionaire John Jacob Astor III in 1890, his younger hermit William Astor?s mother Caroline, the Latest York multitude diva, spoken she was the amicable conduct of the family as good as had to be called only Mrs Astor, as against to Mrs William Astor, as was the norm.

JJ Astor?s son, William Waldorf Astor, was so murderous during this appropriation which he tore down his family palace subsequent to his aunt?s as good as built the outrageous road residence, the Waldorf, to dwarf it. She attempted to omit what she discharged as ?a saved pub subsequent door? prior to in the future giving in as good as relocating out, permitting her some-more mild son to rip down their residence as good as set up the relating road residence, the Astoria, which in the future joined with his cousin?s as the Waldorf-Astoria.

Another critical Latest York road residence, the Pierre, right away run by the Taj, was built by hotelier Charles Pierre Casalesco, who was perturbed during the tumble of manners due to ?the immeasurable approved distance of World War we parties as good as wantonness breach guzzling which followed.? The 42-story palace was meant to be the lapse to the disdainful ways of aged Latest York, yet the Good Depression set in shortly after it was finished in 1929 as good as it went bankrupt. The customer was oil millionaire J Paul Getty, who sole the series of apartments to identical super-rich survivors of the Depression.

When the Taj in the future took over the government, it was presented as an critical ubiquitous incursion for the organisation ? yet it is tough not to consternation if the organisation was not during all shabby by the awaiting of saying the Taj name as good as the Indian dwindle drifting outward the single of the many prestigious addresses upon Fifth Avenue. The single of the some-more unsentimental reasons for opening hotels has been related to transportation.

The bang in Bombay which done the road residence identical to the Taj probable was partly driven by the opening of the Suez Canal, as good as the single family which done the income there, the Baghdadi Jewish Kadoories, shifted their bottom to Hong Kong as good as in 1928 non-stop the Peninsula, the single of the grandest hotels in Eastern Middle East, to happen during the same time with the execution of rail links which brought the city closer to the rest of China.

Another critical road residence combined by the railways was the Pera Palace in Istanbul, grown by the association which ran the critical Orient Express sight since they realised their guest would need the place of as many peculiarity to nap in once they in the future reached Istanbul.( Agatha Christie would after write many of her Murder upon the Orient Express in the road residence) .

Government regulations can be an astonishing reason for opening hotels. When Theodore Roosevelt was military government official of Latest York, he enforced the rarely without the friend magnitude called the Raines Law, written to cut down upon celebration by banning the sale of ethanol upon Sunday ? the many renouned day for drinking.

The the single difference was for hotels which could offer ethanol with food or in bedrooms, as good as roughly during once bars proposed opening 10 bedrooms ? the smallest series compulsory ? as good as incited in to hotels. Of march, the bars weren?t antithetic to the bedrooms being used, in any approach, as good as unequivocally shortly the outrageous bang in harlotry took place regulating them, all subverting the moralistic intentions of the law.

In Chennai currently, likewise foolish measures need bars to be trustworthy to hotels, as good as the little have combined lodges for this role, yet it isn?t transparent if this has facilitated prostitution.

The little of the owners of the grand hotels have, of march, used their properties for identical reasons as good as even for some-more sanctioned purposes it is obviously utterly the flog to have the grand as good as well-run residence to stay in. The Ambanis have tweaked this regulation somewhat by removing in the Oberoi?s services to run Antillia, their argumentative latest skyscraper palace, which insiders contend is run identical to the road residence, with the physical education instructor for any floor. Yet even during the some-more ubiquitous corporate turn, there have been ways in which the liberality business? imagination can be used opposite the group.

The Taj does the good understanding for the Tata Organisation, from upon condition which glorious catering during the Bombay Residence domicile, to provision food( around the moody catering auxiliary) to cafes during Westside stores run by Trent, the Tatas? sell operation.

The Taj mostly handles liberality during Tata Organisation events, not for giveaway, yet positively during unequivocally rival rates, as good as Tata managers additionally get to operate Taj properties wherever they transport during special rates. As good as in Mumbai, the Taj runs Wellington Mews, the formidable of oppulance operate apartments which the Tatas grown upon an existent parcel of skill owned by the group. With the ITC Organisation, the hotels multiplication has been means to operate their land resources profitably.

?We have the vast land bank as good as this has been the good approach to precedence it, ? explains ITC orator Bindu Panicker. The ITC Grand Central in Mumbai, for e.g., was built upon the site of an aged cigarette bureau as good as the ITC Gardenia in Bangalore came up upon the devalue where comparison association officials used to have their bungalows. Panicker says the alternative large synergy of the hotels with the rest of the association has been in the operate of products.

We operate all sorts of ITC products. Paper from the paper multiplication, ITC matches as good as agarbattis, Fiama di Wills toiletries from the personal caring multiplication, Aashirvaad atta from ITC Dishes, as good as more. With ITC Dishes, in sole, the collaborations have been mixed, with tip chefs from the hotels assisting the dishes multiplication rise products identical to the Kitchens of India finished food( the single of the products, Bukhara Dal, links without delay to the grill during ITC Maurya) .

Maybe the greatest cases of owners benefitting from hotels come not from the large bondage, yet particular hotels which have been leased out to the bondage to run. The owners of these hotels, who have been typically internal businessmen with the skill, yet not the imagination to run the road residence, good from carrying the veteran group regulating the place in lapse for the commission of the income ? as good as multiform alternative benefits.

The form these take varies; the little bondage have grave, stereotyped programmes for owners, yet others keep the contracts particular as good as have been presumably not as well penetrating upon all owners removing to know what the others have been getting.

Typically, yet, the package would embody operate of alternative properties as good as services of the road residence sequence up to an concluded amount. Yet there is additionally an unsubstantial good which comes by the chain?s ubiquitous physical education instructor posted to the property. The poignant partial of his pursuit involves gripping the owners happy, as good as this can be onerous.

Managers have been mostly asked to get bookings during alternative budding properties during the busiest times of the year, as good as since these have been owners they can?t be refused, so many vagrant as good as pleading for favours in in between road residence managers take place.

The flipside of this yet is which since such owners lend towards to have alternative commercial operation interests in the same city as the road residence, the solid tide of commercial operation can accumulate from upon condition which liberality services to them. ?You do have to be organisation as good as contend no to freebies not specified in owners contracts, ? explains the single ubiquitous manager.

?And of march, they will get the special rate, yet afterwards it will be unchanging revenue.? The family in in between owners as good as hotels can be difficult as good as spasmodic unequivocally diligent ? there?s the scandalous story of how the owners of the Imperial in Delhi demanded the Oberois lapse it in only the condition they got it, so MS Oberoi ripped out each airconditioning channel as good as infrastructure alleviation, withdrawal the sum mess. Yet with sufficient give as good as take upon both sides, both hotels, which do need deep-pocketed investors, as good as the owners can have the profitable attribute which goes over only business.

Tags: India, London, Mexico Cuba Australia year Shenzhen SHANGHAI HANGZHOU Brazil Korea Male Mexico Spain Japan GUANGZHOU Places Russia South Africa Canada chengdu Taiwan London Lome North France Paris Vietnam Hong Kong Thailand Tour packages Hua Bangkok China Daily WASHINGTON Italy Beijing India New Zealand Lima Singapore Hotel w Macau China Travel Oman Malaysia China SOUTH

Source: http://www.chinatravelarticle.com/news/hotelnews/abounding-investing-hotels-reaps-unsubstantial-gains.html

happy halloween happy halloween history of halloween eagles cowboys eagles cowboys trick or treat times trick or treat times

Tuesday, January 24, 2012

HRW calls on West to end 'Arab exception' (AP)

CAIRO ? Popular uprisings sweeping the Arab world exposed biases by Western governments that supported Arab autocratic rulers for the sake of "stability" while turning a blind eye to their repressive policies, Human Rights Watch said Sunday.

The New-York based group urged democratic governments to adopt persistent and consistent support for peaceful protesters and to press both autocratic rulers and newly emerging democracies to avoid intolerance and seeking revenge.

"The events of the past year show that the forced silence of people living under autocrats should never have been mistaken for popular complacency," HRW's executive director Kenneth Roth said. "It is time to end the 'Arab exception.'"

The Arab Spring revolts began in Tunisia in late 2010 and quickly spread to Egypt, Libya, Yemen, Syria and Bahrain, deposing or challenging authoritarian rulers as citizens who long seemed incapable or unwilling to rise against decades of repression took to the streets in a stunning awakening.

In some ways, the unexpected uprisings amounted to a slap to the United States and other Western governments, which had supported autocratic regimes that served as bulwarks against Islamists hostile to the West and appeared to offer stability in a volatile region.

Western governments also have been accused of being selective in supporting the protesters, with NATO airstrikes proving key to the ouster of slain Libyan strongman Moammar Gadhafi. Meanwhile, the West has stood largely on the sidelines amid continued crackdowns in Bahrain, Yemen and Syria.

"The people driving the Arab Spring deserve strong international support to realize their rights and to build genuine democracies," Roth said in the group's annual report, which covers some 90 countries. He added that the Arab world is in a "transformative moment," and it will not be an easy one.

Human Rights Watch pointed to five main issues that dominated the relationship between Western governments and their Arab autocratic friends: the threat of political Islam, the fight against terrorism, support for Israel, protection of the oil flow and cooperation in stemming immigration.

Even after the leaders of Egypt, Libya and Tunisia were toppled, Western governments remained hesitant to lean too hard on other shaky authoritarian leaders, the group said.

As an example, the watchdog group singled out the United States, saying it has been reluctant to "press Egypt's ruling military council to subject itself to elected civilian rule," nearly a year after the country's longtime leader was ousted following an 18-day uprising.

Roth acknowledged Western governments were re-evaluating their policies as new governments emerge in the region, but said changes have been selective.

"The West has not put Bahrain under pressure, and other monarchs, to carry out reforms," he told The Associated Press in an interview ahead of the report's release in Cairo.

The organization also blamed the Western hesitation in part on the ascendence of political Islam in most of the countries that witnessed the fall of their autocratic rulers like Egypt, Libya, and Tunisia.

HRW urged the West to recognize that Islamists are the "majority preference," while keeping pressure on the emerging new governments to respect human rights, especially regarding women and religious minorities.

Roth was cautious when asked about concerns about potential human rights violations under Islamist rule, particularly in Egypt where the Muslim Brotherhood and ultraconservative Salafis won a majority of seats in the first post-Hosni Mubarak parliament.

He said the Muslim Brotherhood has been "saying the right things" but "we have to see how they govern and how they deal with women, religious minorities. These are the big questions."

The popular uprisings also have alarmed other repressive regimes such as China, Zimbabwe, North Korea, Ethiopia, Vietnam, and Uzbekistan, where rulers were worried about facing similar fates. The group said China and Russia in particular acted "obstructionist," using their veto power at the U.N. security council to halt pressure on Syria to stop killings of protesters.

Saudi Arabia also continues to discriminate against its citizens and workers, according to HRW, which said 9 million women, 8 million foreign workers and 2 million Shiite citizens are either suppressed or lacking rights in the country.

"As we mark the first anniversary of the Arab Spring, we should stand firmly for the rights and aspirations of the individual over the spoils of the tyrant," Roth said.

Outside the Arab world, the last year has not witnessed significant progress in countries with poor human rights records, including China and North Korea, according to the report.

Corruption, poverty and repression still prevail in Equatorial Guinea, the tiny, oil-rich nation off the western coast of Africa, which has been ruled by Africa's longest-serving ruler Teodoro Obiang Nguema since he seized power in a 1979 coup, the group said.

Eritrea continues to be governed by "one of the world's most repressive governments," and its citizens are subjected to torture, detentions, restrictions on freedom of speech, HRW said.

It also cited Colombia, saying armed conflict in the South American country has displaced millions while paramilitary groups with ties to the security apparatus are on the rise.

Cuba, HRW said, remains "the only country in Latin America that represses virtually all forms of political dissent."

The group also claimed that even member states of the European Union have violated human rights through restrictive asylum and migration policies.

Source: http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/rss/world/*http%3A//news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20120122/ap_on_re_mi_ea/human_rights_report

lightning dominica fiji fiji ruby tuesday aliens michael j fox

Monday, January 23, 2012

Apple share of smartphone market rises with iPhone 4S release

According to Nielsen, the amount of all smartphones running iOS -- namely the iPhone -- rose from 30% to 37% over the last 3 months, compared to the share of all smartphones running Android OS -- namely 8 googlezillion at last official count -- rose from 46.3% to 51.7%.


Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheIphoneBlog/~3/oKiTC2CDHQk/story01.htm

christina hendricks emmys emmys tom bosley nina dobrev nina dobrev jon hamm

Elusive Z- DNA found on nucleosomes

Friday, January 20, 2012

New research published in BioMed Central's open access journal Cell & Bioscience is the first to show that left-handed Z-DNA, normally only found at sites where DNA is being copied, can also form on nucleosomes.

The structure of DNA which provides the blueprint for life has famously been described as a double helix. To save space inside the nucleus, DNA is tightly wound around proteins to form nucleosomes which are then further wound and compacted into chromatin, which is further compacted into chromosomes.

But this familiar image of a right handed coil (also called B-DNA) is not the only form of DNA. At sites where DNA is being copied into RNA (the messenger which is used as the instruction to make proteins) the DNA needs to unwind, and, in a process of negative supercoiling, can form a left-handed variety of the DNA double helix (Z-DNA).

It was originally thought that Z-DNA could only be formed in the presence of active RNA polymerase (the enzyme which assembles RNA). However more recently it has been discovered that SWI/SNF, a protein involved in remodeling nucleosomes and allowing RNA polymerase access to DNA, can convert certain sequences of B to Z-DNA.

The team of researchers led by Dr Keji Zhao discovered that they could convert B-DNA to Z-DNA on nucleosomes by the addition of SWI/SNF and ATP (the cell's energy source) and that the Z-nucleosome formed was a novel structure.

Dr Zhao, from the NIH, explained, "The fact that we have found Z-DNA on nucleosomes is a new step in understanding the roles of chromosome remodeling and Z-DNA in regulating gene expression. While the Z-nucleosome is likely to be a transient structure it nevertheless provides a window of opportunity for the placement of DNA binding proteins which may recruit, regulate, or block the transcription machinery and hence protein expression."

###

BioMed Central: http://www.biomedcentral.com

Thanks to BioMed Central for this article.

This press release was posted to serve as a topic for discussion. Please comment below. We try our best to only post press releases that are associated with peer reviewed scientific literature. Critical discussions of the research are appreciated. If you need help finding a link to the original article, please contact us on twitter or via e-mail.

This press release has been viewed 71 time(s).

Source: http://www.labspaces.net/116908/Elusive_Z__DNA_found_on_nucleosomes

tesla model s prohibition alex honnold nbc news dexter season 6 koch industries andy rooney 60 minutes

Sunday, January 22, 2012

Police: 'Coordinated' north Nigiera attacks kill 7

KANO, Nigeria (AP) ? Attacks claimed by a radical Islamist sect in north Nigeria's largest city hit eight security posts, police said, killing at least seven people as gunfire still echoed down streets Saturday morning.

Soldiers and police officers swarmed over streets Saturday in Kano, a city of more than 9 million people that remains an important political and religious hub in Nigeria's Muslim north. Gun shots could be heard near a state police command in the city, remnants of a wide-ranging attack launched by the sect known as Boko Haram.

In a statement issued late Friday, federal police spokesman Olusola Amore said attackers targeted five police buildings, two immigration offices and the local headquarters of the State Security Service, Nigeria's secret police.

Amore said the attacks caused seven deaths, matching the accounts from witness statements immediately after the attacks began Friday afternoon. However, the death toll could rise given the scope of the assault.

"The police have commenced investigation and therefore use this medium to call for calm among the residents of Kano as police are doing their best to bring the situation under control," Amore said. Police are "appealing to members of the public to come forward with information on the identity and location of these hoodlums. Information given will be treated with utmost confidentiality."

Amore could not be immediately reached for comment Saturday.

Whether anyone trusts the police remains another matter as security agencies remain unable to stop the increasingly bloody sectarian attacks by Boko Haram on Nigeria's weak central government. Earlier this week, the police acknowledged the alleged mastermind of a Catholic church bombing at Christmas escaped custody, yet another embarrassment for security agencies amid the violence.

The attacks began at 5 p.m. Friday, following afternoon prayers as workers began to leave their offices in the sprawling, dusty city, witnesses said.

A massive blast at a regional police headquarters shook cars miles (kilometers) away, an Associated Press reporter said. The blast came from a suicide car bomber who drove into the regional headquarters compound and detonated his explosives, deputy superintendent of police Aminu Ringim said. The explosion tore away the headquarters' roof and blew out the building's windows.

Inmates at the regional police headquarters fled amid gunfire, witnesses said.

State authorities declared a 24-hour curfew late Friday as residents hid inside their homes amid the fighting.

A Boko Haram spokesman using the nom de guerre Abul-Qaqa claimed responsibility for the attacks in a message to journalists. He said the attack came as the state government refused to release Boko Haram members held by the police.

Boko Haram has carried out increasingly sophisticated and bloody attacks in its campaign to implement strict Shariah law across Nigeria, a multiethnic nation of more than 160 million people.

Boko Haram, whose name means "Western education is sacrilege" in the local Hausa language, is responsible for at least 510 killings last year alone, according to an AP count. So far this year, the group has been blamed for at least 76 killings, according to an AP count.

Boko Haram's targets have included both Muslims and Christians. However, the group has begun specifically targeting Christians after promising it will kill any Christians living in Nigeria's predominantly Muslim north. That has further inflamed religious and ethnic tensions in Nigeria, which has seen ethnic violence kill thousands in recent years.

Friday's attacks also could cause more unrest, as violence in Kano has set off attacks throughout the north in the past, including postelection violence in April that saw 800 people killed. Kano, an ancient city, remains important in the history of Islam in Nigeria and has important religious figures there even today.

Authorities previously believed they destroyed Boko Haram in 2009, after a riot and ensuing security crackdown in Nigeria's northeast killed 700 people, including its then-leader Mohammed Yusuf. The group began to re-emerge in 2010, as authorities blamed motorcycle-riding gunmen from the sect for targeted assassinations.

However, the sect's attacks have grown more complex and deadly over time. Boko Haram claimed responsibility for an August suicide car bombing that targeted the U.N. headquarters in the capital, killing 25 people and wounding more than 100. The sect killed at least 42 people during a series of attacks Christmas Day in Nigeria that included the bombing of a Catholic church outside the country's capital Abuja.

In a video released last week, Imam Abubakar Shekau, Boko Haram's current leader, said the government could not handle attacks by the group.

Although President Goodluck Jonathan, a Christian from southern Nigeria, has declared emergency rule in some regions, the sect is blamed for almost daily attacks. Jonathan also has said he believes the sect has infiltrated security agencies and government offices in the country, though he has offered no evidence to back up the claim.

___

Associated Press writer Ibrahim Garba contributed to this report.

___

Jon Gambrell reported from Lagos, Nigeria and can be reached at www.twitter.com/jongambrellAP.

Associated Press

Source: http://hosted2.ap.org/APDEFAULT/cae69a7523db45408eeb2b3a98c0c9c5/Article_2012-01-21-AF-Nigeria-Violence/id-4524ad410e364f0babe4d3eff7b962e6

watch movies online for free papillon papillon oc oc professor professor

Saturday, January 21, 2012

GOP field feeds South Carolina's anti-federal mood

Republican presidential candidate, former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, accompanied by South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley, throws an apple out to the audience as he campaigns at Harmon Tree Farm in Gilbert, S.C., Friday, Jan. 20, 2012. (AP Photo/Charles Dharapak)

Republican presidential candidate, former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, accompanied by South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley, throws an apple out to the audience as he campaigns at Harmon Tree Farm in Gilbert, S.C., Friday, Jan. 20, 2012. (AP Photo/Charles Dharapak)

Republican presidential candidate, former House Speaker Newt Gingrich exits after a visit to Children's Hospital, Friday, Jan. 20, 2012, in Charleston, S.C. (AP Photo/Matt Rourke)

Republican presidential candidate, former Pennsylvania Sen. Rick Santorum speaks at Hudson's BBQ in Lexington, S.C., Friday, Jan. 20, 2012. (AP Photo/Paul Sancya)

Republican presidential candidate, Rep. Ron Paul, R-Texas speaks during a campaign rally in an airplane hanger, Friday, Jan. 20, 2012, in North Charleston, S.C. (AP Photo/David Goldman)

(AP) ? South Carolina is the land of Revolutionary War heroes and was the first state to secede from the union. But its suspicion of federal government intrusion is hardly part of its storied past.

It's a sentiment that all the Republican presidential candidates are playing to as they court GOP voters with this argument: that President Barack Obama has eroded individual rights by stretching the federal government's reach and that only they can get Washington to back off. This pitch resonates strongly in a state where the Confederate Flag still flies in front of the state Capitol.

"We're tired of having the feds tell us what to do here. It's part of who we are," says Cole Naus, a 32-year-old Republican from Florence who heard Rick Santorum speak in the run-up to Saturday's primary. "We know we can do it better here. We know what's best for our kids, our families and our workers."

There's a historical suspicion, even hostility, here when it comes to the federal government. Experts say those feelings are aggravated further by a president who is unpopular in the state.

"All that presents a potent cocktail of anger and frustration," said Jon Lerner, a Republican strategist who has advised South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley and Rep. Tim Scott.

Indeed, feelings are raw among many in Republican-leaning South Carolina over three recent Obama administration policies or actions. And all the candidates, from Mitt Romney on down, have stoked the anger.

"Most of the things the federal government could do to get us back to work is get out of the way," Texas Rep. Ron Paul said Thursday during a debate in Charleston. Romney, the former Massachusetts governor, added: "Let's not have the federal government extend its tentacles into every area of this country."

The candidates universally blame the Democratic administration for threatening 1,000 jobs at a Boeing Co. plant in North Charleston.

"The National Labor Relations Board, now stacked with union stooges selected by the president, says to a free enterprise like Boeing, 'You can't build a factory in South Carolina because South Carolina is a right-to-work state,'" Romney, the GOP front-runner, says in a television ad airing here.

The White House hopefuls rail against the Justice Department's decision to block the state's get-tough voter ID law.

"They pursue common-sense, anti-fraud measures that states have put in place all because they believe it's a partisan advantage," Santorum tells audiences here.

The candidates also seethe over a federal court's ruling against the state's new hardline immigration law.

As Gingrich recently argued: "It's pretty outrageous when the federal government fails to do its job and then attacks the states for trying to fill the gap created by the federal government."

These are sure-fire applause lines as they court GOP loyalists who vote in the primary. But the issues have little to do with the state's No. 1 concern ? jobs.

And in some cases, the candidates stretch the facts of the three direct confrontations between South Carolina and the Obama administration.

All have weighed in loudly on what until recently was a long dispute with the National Labor Relations Board over the Boeing Co. plant. The board charged that the aircraft maker was building the facility in South Carolina in retaliation over past contract disputes because South Carolina's right-to-work law means employees are not required to join labor unions.

The GOP candidates commonly re-interpret that argument as punishment for choosing a weak union state. They still bring up the issue even though it was resolved last month when Boeing and the Machinists union reached a contract extension and the labor board dropped its legal action. With South Carolina's unemployment approaching 10 percent, the candidates have stoked fears that the NLRB's actions are prompting companies to look overseas instead of at right-to-work states when they want to open new plants or expand operations.

Another issue is a federal judge's decision last month blocking several provisions of the state's new immigration law from taking effect this month. It includes the requirement that police check the immigration status of people pulled over for speeding if officers also suspect they are in the country illegally.

Candidates often assail the U.S. Justice Department's move as they work to convince a conservative Republican electorate that they're tough on border security.

The Justice Department also blocked the state's new voter ID law from going into effect.

Haley also has fueled sentiment against the federal government. She has described the decision to block the voter ID law as part of "the continued war on South Carolina" and has vowed to fight the federal government in court over the issue.

Her state is among at least a half-dozen that passed similar laws last year.

A tea party favorite, Haley also has said that dealing with federal regulations is the chief burden and top frustration of her job as governor.

U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder has said his department is committed to fighting laws that create barriers to voting. He reinforced the point on Monday, the federal holiday honoring Martin Luther King Jr., as he stood on the north steps of the Capitol in Columbia.

"Let me be very, very clear ? the arc of American history has bent toward the inclusion, not the exclusion, of more of our fellow citizens in the electoral process," Holder said. "We must ensure that this continues."

But the arc in South Carolina plays out in a state whose Statehouse is packed with reminders of glorified federal fights: secession chiseled in marble; its heroes of civil war and segregation glaring from statues and paintings throughout.

__

Associated Press writer Jim Davenport contributed to this report.

Associated Press

Source: http://hosted2.ap.org/APDEFAULT/89ae8247abe8493fae24405546e9a1aa/Article_2012-01-20-South%20Carolina-Federal%20Furor/id-e687b89615a34e458b360d66c14e8c77

kid cudi ben breedlove matt barnes jim jones hcm loretta lynn gene kelly zoe saldana